Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court

510 F. App'x 298

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2292

StatusPublished

This text of 510 F. App'x 298 (Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court, 510 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

[299]*299Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action and denial of his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[299]*299Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action and denial of his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 F. App'x 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-montgomery-county-circuit-court-ca4-2013.