Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court

510 F. App'x 298

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. No. 12-2292·Published

Opinion

[299] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action and denial of his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[299] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action and denial of his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court, 510 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

510 F. App'x 298 (Koch v. Montgomery County Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.