Koch v. Koch

New York Family Court

Koch v. Koch

99 Misc. 2d 124, 415 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2220

CourtNew York Family Court

DecidedApril 2, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 Misc. 2d 124 (Koch v. Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Family Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koch v. Koch, 99 Misc. 2d 124, 415 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur J. Abrams, J.

There is no authority for an award of counsel fees in a custody proceeding other than from one parent to another (Matter of Carnese v Carnese, 93 Misc 558).

Subdivision (b) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law, the applicable statute, provides that only a husband or father can be directed to pay counsel fees in a custody proceeding. This section was amended in 1978 and the Legislature saw fit not to alter the above-stated provision despite the fact that existing section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law gave a grandparent the right to petition for visitation of a grandchild under certain circumstances. Thus, we hold that the special financial interdependence that exists between spouses and parents that gives rise to the obligation to pay counsel fees in a custody proceeding does not exist between a mother-in-law and a daughter-in-law as in the case at bar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur J. Abrams, J.

There is no authority for an award of counsel fees in a custody proceeding other than from one parent to another (Matter of Carnese v Carnese, 93 Misc 558).

Subdivision (b) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law, the applicable statute, provides that only a husband or father can be directed to pay counsel fees in a custody proceeding. This section was amended in 1978 and the Legislature saw fit not to alter the above-stated provision despite the fact that existing section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law gave a grandparent the right to petition for visitation of a grandchild under certain circumstances. Thus, we hold that the special financial interdependence that exists between spouses and parents that gives rise to the obligation to pay counsel fees in a custody proceeding does not exist between a mother-in-law and a daughter-in-law as in the case at bar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Misc. 2d 124, 415 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-koch-nyfamct-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack