Koch v. Haven-Busch Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koch v. Haven-Busch Co.

41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 A.D.2d 774 (Koch v. Haven-Busch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koch v. Haven-Busch Co., 41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Goodrich Associates, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 24, 1972, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all cross complaints interposed against it. Order reversed, on the law, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to appellant against defendants Haven-Busch Co., Compo Bros., Inc., Goodnor Construction Corp. and E. J. Korvette, and cross complaints of said defendants against Goodrich Associates, Inc., dismissed; and the cross complaint of the third-party defendant, Biltmore Construction, Inc., against Goodrich Associates, Inc., is deemed discontinued pursuant to stipulation; without costs. In our opinión, the uncontroverted claim in the affidavits submitted in behalf of appellant, that it had no connection with the incidents complained of and was erroneously named a defendant, entitled it to summary relief against the cross complaints. The main action against appellant was discontinued by stipulation. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Goodrich Associates, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 24, 1972, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all cross complaints interposed against it. Order reversed, on the law, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to appellant against defendants Haven-Busch Co., Compo Bros., Inc., Goodnor Construction Corp. and E. J. Korvette, and cross complaints of said defendants against Goodrich Associates, Inc., dismissed; and the cross complaint of the third-party defendant, Biltmore Construction, Inc., against Goodrich Associates, Inc., is deemed discontinued pursuant to stipulation; without costs. In our opinión, the uncontroverted claim in the affidavits submitted in behalf of appellant, that it had no connection with the incidents complained of and was erroneously named a defendant, entitled it to summary relief against the cross complaints. The main action against appellant was discontinued by stipulation. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-haven-busch-co-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack