Koch v. Bach

290 P. 322, 35 N.M. 93
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedJune 9, 1930
DocketNo. 3451.
StatusPublished

This text of 290 P. 322 (Koch v. Bach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koch v. Bach, 290 P. 322, 35 N.M. 93 (N.M. 1930).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

This case is controlled by Koch v. Ziegler, No. 3417, 290 P. 321, just decided. Though the pleadings, the evidence, and appellee’s position are somewhat different, appellant’s contentions are the same, and must be similarly disposed of. Appellant did, in this case, except to certain findings that they were immaterial to the issues. But, if those exceptions meant that a defense of unreasonable discharge had not been pleaded, it -was too late after appellant had litigated the issue without objection.

The judgment must be affirmed, and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.

CATRON and SIMMS, JJ, concur. BICKLEY, C. J., and PARKER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koch v. Ziegler
290 P. 321 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 P. 322, 35 N.M. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-bach-nm-1930.