Koberstein v. Sierra Glass Co.

675 P.2d 1126, 66 Or. App. 883
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 8, 1984
Docket40-537; CA A22340
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 675 P.2d 1126 (Koberstein v. Sierra Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koberstein v. Sierra Glass Co., 675 P.2d 1126, 66 Or. App. 883 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

WARREN, J.

Both defendants petition for reconsideration of our decision. 65 Or App 409, 671 P2d 1190 (1983). We deny defendant Sierra Glass Co.’s petition and allow defendant Burkhardt’s.

We reversed the trial court as to both defendants because of the trial court’s erroneous ruling concerning the damage aspects of the case. Because the jury concluded that defendant Burkhardt was not negligent, a new trial is not proper as to him. We modify our former opinion accordingly.

Former opinion modified; affirmed as to defendant Burkhardt; reversed and remanded as to defendant Sierra Glass.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

York v. Paakkonen
313 P.3d 332 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
Brus v. Goodell
849 P.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 P.2d 1126, 66 Or. App. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koberstein-v-sierra-glass-co-orctapp-1984.