Kober v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kober v. Richardson

207 A.D.2d 959, 616 N.Y.S.2d 836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 959 (Kober v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kober v. Richardson, 207 A.D.2d 959, 616 N.Y.S.2d 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff wife’s vehicle had stopped for a stopped school bus when it was struck from the rear by defendants’ vehicle. Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs partial summary judgment on liability. Defendant driver testified at her deposition that she did not expect plaintiff driver to stop for a school bus, despite her knowledge that the flashing yellow lights on the bus indicated that the bus was "ready to slow down to make a stop.” Defendants failed to raise an issue of fact whether plaintiff driver was comparatively negligent. (Appeal from Order of [960]*960Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff wife’s vehicle had stopped for a stopped school bus when it was struck from the rear by defendants’ vehicle. Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs partial summary judgment on liability. Defendant driver testified at her deposition that she did not expect plaintiff driver to stop for a school bus, despite her knowledge that the flashing yellow lights on the bus indicated that the bus was "ready to slow down to make a stop.” Defendants failed to raise an issue of fact whether plaintiff driver was comparatively negligent. (Appeal from Order of [960]*960Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 959, 616 N.Y.S.2d 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kober-v-richardson-nyappdiv-1994.