Kober v. Lyle
This text of 177 A.D. 903 (Kober v. Lyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of an amended complaint and demurrer thereto. The defendant did not make a cross motion. It was not in accordance with the practice of this court as' established by Ventriniglia v. Eichner (138 App. Div. 274) upon denial of plaintiff’s motion, to enter an order as if the defendant had also moved. Therefore, the order appealed from should be modified by confining it to a denial of plaintiff’s motion, leaving the defendant to make such motion as he may be advised; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Shearn, JJ. Order modified as stated in order, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kober-v-lyle-nyappdiv-1917.