Kobe v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kobe v. Northern Pacific Railroad

32 N.W. 783, 36 Minn. 518, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 262

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 29, 1887

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 32 N.W. 783 (Kobe v. Northern Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kobe v. Northern Pacific Railroad, 32 N.W. 783, 36 Minn. 518, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 262 (Mich. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Berry, J.

The statute requires every railroad company in the state to build and maintain good and'' sufficient cattle-guards at all wagon crossings, and good and substantial fences on each side of its road. Gen. St. 1878, c. 34, §§ 54, 55. In Greeley v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 33 Minn. 136, (22 N. W. Rep. 179,) this statute was held to be subject to an implied exception as to places required to be left open by public necessity or convenience, such as station or depot grounds, used for the exit or entrance of passengers, or the receipt and delivery of freight. But it was also held that this public convenience is the limit of the exception. The obvious purpose of the [519]*519statute is to prevent domestic animals from going upon railroad tracks. This purpose is to be kept in mind, notwithstanding the exception, which simply operates to modify or qualify the general obligation to fence so far only as the necessity upon which it rests requires; that is to say, save so far as is necessary to afford convenient and suitable access to station or depot grounds, the road must be protected from the incursions of domestic animals by guards and fences. For the purpose of accomplishing the manifest design of the statute, the places which it is necessary to leave open to afford such access may properly be regarded as, or as in the nature of, wagon crossings, and the passing of domestic animals from the depot grounds to the track beyond their limits, in either direction, is to be fenced or guarded against in like manner as in case of such crossings. In this view of the law, it makes no difference, as respects the liability of a company, whether cattle killed upon its track, outside of depot grounds, reach the place where they are killed by passing over or through such grounds, or by going upon the track at any other place required to be •fenced.

This disposes of the law of the case, and, upon the evidence, the - jury were at liberty to determine the questions of fact adversely (as they have done) to defendant.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry, J.

The statute requires every railroad company in the state to build and maintain good and'' sufficient cattle-guards at all wagon crossings, and good and substantial fences on each side of its road. Gen. St. 1878, c. 34, §§ 54, 55. In Greeley v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 33 Minn. 136, (22 N. W. Rep. 179,) this statute was held to be subject to an implied exception as to places required to be left open by public necessity or convenience, such as station or depot grounds, used for the exit or entrance of passengers, or the receipt and delivery of freight. But it was also held that this public convenience is the limit of the exception. The obvious purpose of the [519]*519statute is to prevent domestic animals from going upon railroad tracks. This purpose is to be kept in mind, notwithstanding the exception, which simply operates to modify or qualify the general obligation to fence so far only as the necessity upon which it rests requires; that is to say, save so far as is necessary to afford convenient and suitable access to station or depot grounds, the road must be protected from the incursions of domestic animals by guards and fences. For the purpose of accomplishing the manifest design of the statute, the places which it is necessary to leave open to afford such access may properly be regarded as, or as in the nature of, wagon crossings, and the passing of domestic animals from the depot grounds to the track beyond their limits, in either direction, is to be fenced or guarded against in like manner as in case of such crossings. In this view of the law, it makes no difference, as respects the liability of a company, whether cattle killed upon its track, outside of depot grounds, reach the place where they are killed by passing over or through such grounds, or by going upon the track at any other place required to be •fenced.

This disposes of the law of the case, and, upon the evidence, the - jury were at liberty to determine the questions of fact adversely (as they have done) to defendant.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.W. 783, 36 Minn. 518, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kobe-v-northern-pacific-railroad-minn-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack