Kobayashi v. City and County of Honolulu
This text of Kobayashi v. City and County of Honolulu (Kobayashi v. City and County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 26-JAN-2023 07:53 AM Dkt. 307 OAWST
NOS. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX AND CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
YOSHIKO KOBAYASHI, 1 Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, and STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff/ Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a Municipal Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Hawai‘i, Third-Party Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant- Appellee/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Third-Party Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and FINISH LINE PROPERTIES, LLC., Third-Party Defendant/ Cross-Claim Plaintiff/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellee, and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-100, Third-Party Defendants.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 14-1-0921)
1 Pursuant to this court's Order entered on January 10, 2023, Yoshiko Kobayashi (Kobayashi) as the duly appointed Personal Representative of Shizuko Matsuda's estate in Probate No. 1-CLP-XX-XXXXXXX, was substituted as plaintiff in this case. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, McCullen, J., and Circuit Court Judge Kubota) Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-
Appellee Yoshiko Kobayashi's and Defendant/Cross-Claim
Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant State
of Hawaii's (State) January 11, 2023 "Stipulation to Dismiss
Appeal" (Stipulation to Dismiss), the papers in support, and the
record and files herein, it appears that:
(1) On January 11, 2023, Kobayashi's counsel
(Counsel) and the State filed the Stipulation to
Dismiss pursuant to Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate
Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b);
a. The Stipulation to Dismiss states
Kobayashi and the State "are the only
remaining parties to the appeal and
cross-appeal";
b. "The parties stipulate that each party
will bear their own fees and costs"; and
c. The Stipulation to Dismiss is dated and
signed by Counsel and the State's
counsel.
(2) This appeal was docketed on September 27, 2018.
(3) No payment is due.
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
The Stipulation to Dismiss complies with HRAP
Rule 42(b) (providing in part that if "parties to a docketed
appeal or other proceeding sign and file a stipulation for
dismissal, specifying the terms as to payment of costs and" pay
the fees that are due, "the case shall be dismissed upon
approval by the appellate court").
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation
to Dismiss is granted.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, January 26, 2023.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
/s/ Peter K. Kubota Circuit Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kobayashi v. City and County of Honolulu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kobayashi-v-city-and-county-of-honolulu-hawapp-2023.