K.O. v. State

914 So. 2d 1044, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18494, 2005 WL 3116526
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-1729
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 914 So. 2d 1044 (K.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K.O. v. State, 914 So. 2d 1044, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18494, 2005 WL 3116526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

K.O. appeals an order adjudicating him to be delinquent. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

K.O. argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of the charge of aggravated assault. We affirm on authority of L.R.W. v. State, 848 So.2d 1263, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

The State concedes that there is an error in the adjudicatory order. On count two, the charge of criminal mischief, the State acknowledges that the charge must be reduced to specify that the damage was under $200. See § 806.13(l)(b)l., Fla. Stat. (2004).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of adjudicatory order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pelecanos v. City of Hallandale Beach
914 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 So. 2d 1044, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18494, 2005 WL 3116526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ko-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.