Knutson v. Tillotson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knutson v. Tillotson

282 A.D.2d 533, 722 N.Y.S.2d 763, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3544

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 533 (Knutson v. Tillotson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knutson v. Tillotson, 282 A.D.2d 533, 722 N.Y.S.2d 763, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for dissolution of a corporation and for a judgment declaring a certain lease and amendments thereto null and void, which was consolidated with an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the lease is valid, Judith A. Calabrese, William A. Knutson, Torkel A. Knutson, Elizabeth A. Knutson-Weber, Peter A. Knutson, Daniel A. Knutson, Kathryn A. Knutson, [534]*534Kirsten A. Loughrane, and Erik A. Knutson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 9, 1999, which denied their motion, in effect, to reargue their prior motion to extend their time to elect to purchase the petitioners’ shares.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Williams v Colonial Tr., 275 AD2d 368). Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for dissolution of a corporation and for a judgment declaring a certain lease and amendments thereto null and void, which was consolidated with an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the lease is valid, Judith A. Calabrese, William A. Knutson, Torkel A. Knutson, Elizabeth A. Knutson-Weber, Peter A. Knutson, Daniel A. Knutson, Kathryn A. Knutson, [534]*534Kirsten A. Loughrane, and Erik A. Knutson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 9, 1999, which denied their motion, in effect, to reargue their prior motion to extend their time to elect to purchase the petitioners’ shares.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Williams v Colonial Tr., 275 AD2d 368). Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 533, 722 N.Y.S.2d 763, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knutson-v-tillotson-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack