Knutsen v. Cinque

113 A.D. 677, 99 N.Y.S. 911, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1510
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The action did not accrue until the expiration of the lease, for the plaintiff could have restored the stalls.up to that time. It follows that the right of action set up- in the counterclaim'is in the defendant’s grantee. He purchased the land" subject to -the lease, and succeeded to his grantor’s rights, under the covenants of the-lease. The covenant to surrender the premises in as good condition as when received ran with the land (Demarest v. Willard[, 8 Cow.. 206 ; Chaplin on L. & T. §, 338).

The judgment should be affirmed.

Hirschberg, P. J., Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, .with costs-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knutsen v. Cinque, 113 A.D. 677, 99 N.Y.S. 911, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

113 A.D. 677 (Knutsen v. Cinque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.
626 P.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1981)
Galli v. B P Oil, Inc.
95 Misc. 2d 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
City of New York v. Patton
390 F. Supp. 1001 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Schimmelfennig v. Grove Farm Co., Ltd.
41 Haw. 124 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1955)
Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.
139 Misc. 808 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Goodale Real Estate Corp. v. Subridge Holding Corp.
139 Misc. 587 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1931)
Pollack v. Jackson
124 Misc. 608 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1925)
Thurber v. Losee
192 A.D. 148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Mauro v. Alvino
90 Misc. 328 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Joseph Fallert Brewing Co. v. Blass
119 A.D. 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)