Knupp v. Bright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Knupp v. Bright

40 A. 414, 186 Pa. 181, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 976

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 16, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 354

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 40 A. 414 (Knupp v. Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knupp v. Bright, 40 A. 414, 186 Pa. 181, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 976 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error.

- The able and ingenious argument of defendant’s counsel failed to convince us that the learned trial judge did not correctly answer all the points recited in said specifications. On the contrary, we think his construction of the contract sued on was substantially correct, as were his answers to each of the points referred to. There is nothing in any of the questions involved that requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error.

- The able and ingenious argument of defendant’s counsel failed to convince us that the learned trial judge did not correctly answer all the points recited in said specifications. On the contrary, we think his construction of the contract sued on was substantially correct, as were his answers to each of the points referred to. There is nothing in any of the questions involved that requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A. 414, 186 Pa. 181, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knupp-v-bright-pa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack