Knupp v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 1, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-01112·Unknown

Opinion

1 M. Ray Hartman III, Bar No. 211205 RHartman@perkinscoie.com 2 Ross E. Bautista, Bar No. 312319 RBautista@perkinscoie.com 3 PERKINS COIE LLP 11452 El Camino Real, Ste 300 4 San Diego, California 92130-2080 Telephone: +1.858.720.5700 5 Facsimile: +1.858.720.5799 6 Attorneys for Defendant AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

10 JOANNE KNUPP, individual, and as Case No. 1:23-CV-01112-ADA-BAM 11 plaintiff’s mother and guardian on behalf of 12 minor child, L.K. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 Plaintiffs, v. Complaint Filed: July 25, 2023 14 Amazon.com Services LLC 15 (“AMAZON”), is a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1-50, 16 inclusive. 17 Defendants. 18 19 1. GENERALLY 20 A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or 22 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 23 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 24 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 25 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 26 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 27 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 1 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 2 This action is likely to involve confidential and proprietary materials and information 3 including, confidential personal, medical, employment, and financial information; confidential or 4 competitively sensitive business or financial information; information regarding confidential 5 business practices or other confidential research, development, or commercial information 6 (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties); or information otherwise 7 generally unavailable to the public or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 8 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 9 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 10 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are 11 entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 12 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of 13 the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in 14 this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for 15 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been 16 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be 17 part of the public record of this case. 18 2. DEFINITIONS 19 2.1 Action: This federal lawsuit entitled Knupp v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al., 20 Case No.: 1:23-cv-01112-ADA-BAM. 21 2.2 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 22 information or items under this Order. 23 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it is 24 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 25 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 26 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support 27 staff). 1 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the 3 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 4 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 5 responses to discovery in this matter. 6 2.7 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 7 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 8 consultant in this Action. 9 2.8 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 10 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 11 2.9 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 12 entity not named as a Party to this action. 13 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 14 Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this 15 Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that 16 party and includes support staff. 17 2.11 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 18 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 19 2.12 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 20 Discovery Material in this Action. 21 2.13 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services 22 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 23 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 24 subcontractors. 25 2.14 Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 26 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 2.15 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 1 3. SCOPE 2 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 3 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 4 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 5 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material, 6 other than during a court hearing or at trial. 7 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. 8 This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 9 4. DURATION 10 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 11 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 12 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 13 claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 14 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this 15 Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 16 pursuant to applicable law. 17 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 18 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 19 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 20 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 21 The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, 22 items or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, 23 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 24 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 25 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knupp v. Amazon.com Services, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Knupp v. Amazon.com Services, LLC (Knupp v. Amazon.com Services, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)