KNUE v. Smith
This text of 720 N.W.2d 755 (KNUE v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Daniel KNUE and Jacqueline Knue, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees,
v.
Joan SMITH, Steve Smith, and Cornelius Casey Smith, a/k/a Casey Smith, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order addressing whether attorney's fees and costs may be assessed pursuant to MCR 2.405(D) in a case involving an equitable claim to quiet title, and whether the $3,000 offer in plaintiffs' counsel's letter of May 16, 2003 was an offer of judgment under MCR 2.405(A)(1), in light of that rule's requirement of a "sum certain," and given the plaintiffs' additional demand for a quitclaim deed. The parties should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 N.W.2d 755, 477 Mich. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knue-v-smith-mich-2006.