Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER)

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedNovember 26, 2025
Docket250319
StatusPublished

This text of Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER) (Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER), (Va. 2025).

Opinion

VIRGINIA:

In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 26th day of November, 2025.

Present: All the Justices

ALEX P. KNUDSEN, PETITIONER,

against Record No. 250319 Circuit Court No. CL23-695

OTERRIUS D. TAYLOR, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

UPON A PETITION UNDER CODE § 8.01-670.2.

This petition for review seeks to invoke our narrow jurisdiction over interlocutory orders.

In 2023, the General Assembly delineated our jurisdiction over this type of direct appeal with the

enactment of Code § 8.01-670.2(A):

When, prior to the commencement of trial, the circuit court has entered in any pending civil action an order granting or denying a plea of sovereign, absolute, or qualified immunity that, if granted, would immunize the movant from compulsory participation in the proceeding, the order is eligible for immediate appellate review.

The “express and unambiguous terms” of this statute require a circuit court to first enter an order

denying a plea of immunity before such ruling can be eligible for appellate review. Comcast of

Chesterfield Cnty., Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors, 277 Va. 293, 306 (2009).

Our review of the record here reveals no such order. The circuit court’s order dated April

1, 2025, setting the case for a jury trial, is not appealable under Code § 8.01-670.2(A) because

the circuit court never denied Knudsen’s plea in bar alleging sovereign immunity, filed October

31, 2023. The Court concludes that it therefore lacks jurisdiction over this petition for review. Accordingly, the Court grants the Respondents’ motion to dismiss and remands the case

to the Circuit Court of the City of Petersburg to take such action it deems appropriate consistent

with this order. Our conclusion here shall not prejudice the Petitioner’s ability to advance any

argument, including argument related to his entitlement to immunity, his demurrers, or the

procedures used by the circuit court, on appeal at the appropriate time.

This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and certified to the Circuit Court of

the City of Petersburg.

A Copy,

Teste:

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comcast of Chesterfield County, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
672 S.E.2d 870 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knudsen-v-taylor-order-va-2025.