Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER)
This text of Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER) (Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
VIRGINIA:
In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 26th day of November, 2025.
Present: All the Justices
ALEX P. KNUDSEN, PETITIONER,
against Record No. 250319 Circuit Court No. CL23-695
OTERRIUS D. TAYLOR, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
UPON A PETITION UNDER CODE § 8.01-670.2.
This petition for review seeks to invoke our narrow jurisdiction over interlocutory orders.
In 2023, the General Assembly delineated our jurisdiction over this type of direct appeal with the
enactment of Code § 8.01-670.2(A):
When, prior to the commencement of trial, the circuit court has entered in any pending civil action an order granting or denying a plea of sovereign, absolute, or qualified immunity that, if granted, would immunize the movant from compulsory participation in the proceeding, the order is eligible for immediate appellate review.
The “express and unambiguous terms” of this statute require a circuit court to first enter an order
denying a plea of immunity before such ruling can be eligible for appellate review. Comcast of
Chesterfield Cnty., Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors, 277 Va. 293, 306 (2009).
Our review of the record here reveals no such order. The circuit court’s order dated April
1, 2025, setting the case for a jury trial, is not appealable under Code § 8.01-670.2(A) because
the circuit court never denied Knudsen’s plea in bar alleging sovereign immunity, filed October
31, 2023. The Court concludes that it therefore lacks jurisdiction over this petition for review. Accordingly, the Court grants the Respondents’ motion to dismiss and remands the case
to the Circuit Court of the City of Petersburg to take such action it deems appropriate consistent
with this order. Our conclusion here shall not prejudice the Petitioner’s ability to advance any
argument, including argument related to his entitlement to immunity, his demurrers, or the
procedures used by the circuit court, on appeal at the appropriate time.
This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and certified to the Circuit Court of
the City of Petersburg.
A Copy,
Teste:
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Knudsen v. Taylor (ORDER), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knudsen-v-taylor-order-va-2025.