Knuckles v. Spaugh
217 S.E.2d 665, 288 N.C. 241, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 915
This text of 217 S.E.2d 665 (Knuckles v. Spaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knuckles v. Spaugh, 217 S.E.2d 665, 288 N.C. 241, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 915 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
William KNUCKLES and Corinthea Richardson
v.
Beatrice SPAUGH et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Gerald C. Kell, for plaintiffs.
Hatfield & Allman, Deal, Hutchins & Minor, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 26 N.C.App. 340, 215 S.E.2d 825. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Knuckles v. Spaugh
215 S.E.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
217 S.E.2d 665, 288 N.C. 241, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knuckles-v-spaugh-nc-1975.