Knox v. United States Postal Service
This text of 311 F. App'x 354 (Knox v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
The United States Postal Service (USPS) moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Fred D. Knox’s petition for review from the Merit Systems Protection Board. Knox opposes. USPS replies.
The Administrative Judge (AJ) issued her initial decision denying Knox’s petition for corrective action under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act on January 16, 2008. According to Knox, he received the AJ’s decision on January 20, 2008. The Board’s decision became final on February 20, 2008 when Knox elected not to file a petition at the Board. Knox’s petition was received by this court on April 24, 2008, sixty-four days after the Board’s decision became final.
Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides that “[njotwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review must be filed within 60 days after the date the petitioner received notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” This filing period is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. Dep’t of Transportation, 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984); see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived).
Knox’s petition was due no later than Monday, April 21, 2008. Because his petition was untimely, Knox’s petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motions are granted. The petition is dismissed.
(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 F. App'x 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-united-states-postal-service-cafc-2008.