Knox v. State

734 S.W.2d 311, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4548
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 11, 1987·No. No. 52537·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knox v. State, 734 S.W.2d 311, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4548 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

734 S.W.2d 311 (Knox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.