Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Knox v. State

Knox v. State

115 So. 3d 1100, 2013 WL 3215239, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10235
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-994
StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 3d 1100 (Knox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knox v. State, 115 So. 3d 1100, 2013 WL 3215239, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10235 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Falcon v. State, 111 So.3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reaffirming the holding in Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), that the decision in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), did not apply retroactively to defendant’s postconviction motion, and certifying question to Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Gonzalez v. State
101 So. 3d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Falcon v. State
111 So. 3d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 So. 3d 1100, 2013 WL 3215239, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.