Knox v. State
708 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4218, 1998 WL 176624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 689 So. 2d 1224 →
Opinion
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing a new five year term of probation in respect to Count II of the information, possession of burglary tools, without giving him credit for time previously served on probation. He bases his argument on State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994) and Redding v. State, 675 So.2d 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The state concedes error. Accordingly we vacate the sentence in regard to Count II and remand for resentencing with proper credit for time previously served on probation.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knox v. State, 708 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4218, 1998 WL 176624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
708 So. 2d 347 (Knox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Redding v. State
675 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)