Knox v. State
This text of 708 So. 2d 347 (Knox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing a new five year term of probation in respect to Count II of the information, possession of burglary tools, without giving him credit for time previously served on probation. He bases his argument on State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994) and Redding v. State, 675 So.2d 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The state concedes error. Accordingly we vacate the sentence in regard to Count II and remand for resentencing with proper credit for time previously served on probation.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4218, 1998 WL 176624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.