Knox v. Pugh
This text of 36 F. App'x 643 (Knox v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bradley Warren Pugh appeals pro se the district court’s order remanding a removed case back to California state court because it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. We lack jurisdiction to review this order and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 128, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-pugh-ca9-2002.