Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad

64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 385, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 308

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 29, 1909

Docket1717

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 1134 (Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad, 64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 385, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 308 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

The sole exception is to the overruling of a motion for a new trial. There is no legal brief of the evidence. What purports to be a . brief of the evidence is fatally defective in two respects: it is not abridged, but consists of the full stenographic report of the oral testimony (that which was excluded as well as that which was admitted', together with a statement of objections of counsel and rulings of the court), to which has been added a full verbatim copy of the interrogatories and answers, and of the documentary exhibits thereto; also it is not approved by the trial judge. The assignments of error can not be considered. Civil Code, §5488; Madison v. State, 4 Ga. App. 218 (60 S. E. 1068). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The sole exception is to the overruling of a motion for a new trial. There is no legal brief of the evidence. What purports to be a . brief of the evidence is fatally defective in two respects: it is not abridged, but consists of the full stenographic report of the oral testimony (that which was excluded as well as that which was admitted', together with a statement of objections of counsel and rulings of the court), to which has been added a full verbatim copy of the interrogatories and answers, and of the documentary exhibits thereto; also it is not approved by the trial judge. The assignments of error can not be considered. Civil Code, §5488; Madison v. State, 4 Ga. App. 218 (60 S. E. 1068). Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 385, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-lexington-terminal-railroad-gactapp-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack