Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad

64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 385, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 308
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1909·No. 1717·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

The sole exception is to the overruling of a motion for a new trial. There is no legal brief of the evidence. What purports to be a . brief of the evidence is fatally defective in two respects: it is not abridged, but consists of the full stenographic report of the oral testimony (that which was excluded as well as that which was admitted', together with a statement of objections of counsel and rulings of the court), to which has been added a full verbatim copy of the interrogatories and answers, and of the documentary exhibits thereto; also it is not approved by the trial judge. The assignments of error can not be considered. Civil Code, §5488; Madison v. State, 4 Ga. App. 218 (60 S. E. 1068). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad, 64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 385, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 308 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

64 S.E. 1134 (Knox v. Lexington Terminal Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lanham v. Presley
68 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)