Knox v. Johnson

New York Supreme Court

Knox v. Johnson

33 N.Y.S. 1129, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 870

DecidedNovember 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.Y.S. 1129 (Knox v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knox v. Johnson, 33 N.Y.S. 1129, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in receiving evidence that the credit was given to defendant. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the court erred in charging that a recovery could be had upon the letter and the standard mortgage clause, and that they amount to a contract between the parties, so that the nlaintiff was entitled to recover the premium on demand. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in receiving evidence that the credit was given to defendant. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the court erred in charging that a recovery could be had upon the letter and the standard mortgage clause, and that they amount to a contract between the parties, so that the nlaintiff was entitled to recover the premium on demand. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.Y.S. 1129, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-johnson-nysupct-1894.