Knox v. Greenleaf
4 U.S. 360, 14 F. Cas. 814, 4 Dall. 360
This text of 4 U.S. 360 (Knox v. Greenleaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knox v. Greenleaf, 4 U.S. 360, 14 F. Cas. 814, 4 Dall. 360 (1802).
Opinion
Knox et al.
versus
Greenleaf.
Supreme Court of United States.
*361 For the plaintiffs, it was contended, by Moylan.
For the defendant, it was contended, by Ingersoll and Dallas.
*362 The COURT were clearly of opinion, that the defendant was entitled to be considered as a citizen of Pennsylvania; and the jury found a verdict accordingly.
Verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. Tompkins
101 F. 539 (Fourth Circuit, 1900)
Blair v. Silver Peak Mines
93 F. 332 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1899)
Amy v. Smith
11 Ky. 326 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1822)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 360, 14 F. Cas. 814, 4 Dall. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-greenleaf-scotus-1802.