Knox v. Florida Parole Commission

825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2002
DocketNo. 1D00-2374
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 825 So. 2d 958 (Knox v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knox v. Florida Parole Commission, 825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Westberry v. Moore, 772 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla.2000) (holding that a defendant who accepts the benefits of control release waives any argument that application of the control release program, in the form of the forfeiture of gain time, was an ex post violation because control release was enacted after the date of his or her offenses); Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So.2d 1201, 1204 (Fla.1997) (“[A]n affirmative election to accept a newly created program waives any potential ex post facto argument the petitioner may have had.”).

WOLF, KAHN and BENTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knox v. State
873 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2002.