Knox v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 825 So. 2d 958 (Knox v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Westberry v. Moore, 772 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla.2000) (holding that a defendant who accepts the benefits of control release waives any argument that application of the control release program, in the form of the forfeiture of gain time, was an ex post violation because control release was enacted after the date of his or her offenses); Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So.2d 1201, 1204 (Fla.1997) (“[A]n affirmative election to accept a newly created program waives any potential ex post facto argument the petitioner may have had.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2002.