Knox v. Florida Parole Commission

825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2002·No. No. 1D00-2374·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Westberry v. Moore, 772 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla.2000) (holding that a defendant who accepts the benefits of control release waives any argument that application of the control release program, in the form of the forfeiture of gain time, was an ex post violation because control release was enacted after the date of his or her offenses); Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So.2d 1201, 1204 (Fla.1997) (“[A]n affirmative election to accept a newly created program waives any potential ex post facto argument the petitioner may have had.”).

WOLF, KAHN and BENTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knox v. Florida Parole Commission, 825 So. 2d 958, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844, 2002 WL 1224955 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 958 (Knox v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knox v. State
873 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)