Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Knox v. Decker

Knox v. Decker

259 A.D.2d 671, 685 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2706
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 671 (Knox v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knox v. Decker, 259 A.D.2d 671, 685 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated February 9, 1998, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff’s action, which is based on General Municipal Law § 205-a, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see, Hoey v Kuchler, 249 AD2d 365; Zanghi v Greyhound Lines, 234 AD2d 930).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zanghi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
234 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Hoey v. Kuchler
249 A.D.2d 365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 671, 685 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-decker-nyappdiv-1999.