Knox v. Brooks
This text of Knox v. Brooks (Knox v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7791
BYRON JOSEPH KNOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron Joseph Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Byron Joseph Knox appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as untimely his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Knox v. Brooks, No. 2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM (E.D.
Va. Aug. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Knox v. Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-brooks-ca4-2009.