Knox v. Brooks

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2009
Docket08-7791
StatusUnpublished

This text of Knox v. Brooks (Knox v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knox v. Brooks, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7791

BYRON JOSEPH KNOX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron Joseph Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Byron Joseph Knox appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Knox v. Brooks, No. 2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM (E.D.

Va. Aug. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Knox v. Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-brooks-ca4-2009.