Knox v. Anderson

163 F. Supp. 822, 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4048
District Court, D. Hawaii·Decided June 24, 1958·No. Civ. No. 1382·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

The defendant voices objection to the-Clerk’s allowance of $319.13 for a minimum round trip first-class plane fare between Los Angeles and Honolulu for expert witness Hal R. Van Cleve.

The objection is overruled and the Clerk’s action sustained.

The Court is aware of such authorities-as Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co., D.C., 10 F.R.D. 248; Barnhart v. Jones, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 423; and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s recognition of the 100-mile rule in Reynolds Metals Co. v. Yturbide, 9 Cir., 258 F.2d 321. However the facts here are distinguishable and squarely fall within the first, proviso of § 1821 of Title 28, United States Code. To interpret “required” as. therein used to mean required by a subpoena would negative the plain meaning of the proviso. See 1949 U.S.Code Cong. Service, p. 1231 and Act of May 10, 1949, 63 Stat. 65.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knox v. Anderson, 163 F. Supp. 822, 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4048 (D. Haw. 1958).

163 F. Supp. 822 (Knox v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company
324 F.2d 359 (Second Circuit, 1963)