Knox Creek Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Fourth Circuit

Knox Creek Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

36 F. App'x 526

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2002·No. No. 01-2338·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of medical payments pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.2001). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Knox Creek Coal Co. v. DOWCP, No. 00-720-BLA (BRB Apr. 20 & Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of medical payments pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.2001). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Knox Creek Coal Co. v. DOWCP, No. 00-720-BLA (BRB Apr. 20 & Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Knox Creek Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 36 F. App'x 526 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

36 F. App'x 526 (Knox Creek Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related