Knox County Farm Bureau v. Wagner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Knox County Farm Bureau v. Wagner

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 41

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knox County Farm Bureau v. Wagner. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ohio App. 466 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1927·Published

Opinion

HOUCK, PJ.

1. In action to recover membership dues to Farm Bureau Federation, charge requnipg certain findings to prevent recovery by plaintiff, but failing to define issues to be determined by jury, or explain questions of fact in dispute, was not proper or legal charge, and was prejudicial error.

2. Charge to jury should state facts raised by pleadings clearly and definitely so as not to be misconstrued by jury.

(Shields and Patterson, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUCK, PJ.

1. In action to recover membership dues to Farm Bureau Federation, charge requnipg certain findings to prevent recovery by plaintiff, but failing to define issues to be determined by jury, or explain questions of fact in dispute, was not proper or legal charge, and was prejudicial error.

2. Charge to jury should state facts raised by pleadings clearly and definitely so as not to be misconstrued by jury.

(Shields and Patterson, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Knox County Farm Bureau v. Wagner, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 41 (Ohio Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 41 (Knox County Farm Bureau v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.