Knox City v. White

Missouri Court of Appeals

Knox City v. White

19 Mo. App. 528, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 260

DecidedNovember 24, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Mo. App. 528 (Knox City v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knox City v. White, 19 Mo. App. 528, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause is identical in all its features, with Knox City v. Thompson (ante, p. 523), wherein the same town is the plaintiff and William T. Thompson is the defendant. The only difference between the two-cases is that in the latter case, the license tax sought to-be enforced was one that imposed upon the defendant a charge of two dollars per six calendar months for the privilege of running a wagon for hire, and in this it is one that imposed upon the defendant a charge of two dollars and fifty cents per annum, for keeping a public scale.

In conformity with our ruling in the above case the judgment- of the trial court in this case must

be affirmed, and is affirmed

with the concurrence of all the judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause is identical in all its features, with Knox City v. Thompson (ante, p. 523), wherein the same town is the plaintiff and William T. Thompson is the defendant. The only difference between the two-cases is that in the latter case, the license tax sought to-be enforced was one that imposed upon the defendant a charge of two dollars per six calendar months for the privilege of running a wagon for hire, and in this it is one that imposed upon the defendant a charge of two dollars and fifty cents per annum, for keeping a public scale.

In conformity with our ruling in the above case the judgment- of the trial court in this case must

be affirmed, and is affirmed

with the concurrence of all the judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Mo. App. 528, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-city-v-white-moctapp-1885.