Knowlton v. Knowlton
This text of 40 Ill. App. 588 (Knowlton v. Knowlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It will be seen by reading the decree set out in the foregoing statement that it finds the appellee is entitled to a separate maintenance from appellant, but that it does not find the amount to be paid, but expressly leaves that for future determination after an inquiry and report shall be made by the master to whom the matter is referred. Such a decree is merely interlocutory, and not the subject of review either on appeal or writ of error; Hunter v. Hunter, 100 Ill. 519.
The writ of error must therefore be dismissed.
Writ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Ill. App. 588, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowlton-v-knowlton-illappct-1891.