Knowlton v. Knowlton

40 Ill. App. 588, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 650
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 2, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Moran, P. J.

It will be seen by reading the decree set out in the foregoing statement that it finds the appellee is entitled to a separate maintenance from appellant, but that it does not find the amount to be paid, but expressly leaves that for future determination after an inquiry and report shall be made by the master to whom the matter is referred. Such a decree is merely interlocutory, and not the subject of review either on appeal or writ of error; Hunter v. Hunter, 100 Ill. 519.

The writ of error must therefore be dismissed.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knowlton v. Knowlton, 40 Ill. App. 588, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 650 (Ill. Ct. App. 1891).

40 Ill. App. 588 (Knowlton v. Knowlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlton v. Knowlton
51 Ill. App. 71 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)