Knowlton v. Hersey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Knowlton v. Hersey

76 Me. 345, 1884 Me. LEXIS 65

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 30, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 Me. 345 (Knowlton v. Hersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knowlton v. Hersey, 76 Me. 345, 1884 Me. LEXIS 65 (Me. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Walton, J.

On the 25th of February, 1880, Alfred Knowlton of Liberty, Maine, wrote a letter to E. C. Hersey & Co. of Portland, of the following tenor.

" Gentlemen: The bearer of this letter, my son-in-law, Mr. Arthur Young, wishes to place a stock of groceries in his provision and meat store in this place. To enable him to do this, I am willing to be responsible to you for the amount of groceries he may order of you.”

The question is whether or not this letter created a continuing-liability. • It appears that Mr. Young went with it to Hersey & Co., selected groceries to the amount of $432.45; for which his father-in-law, Mr. Knowlton, signed notes, which were subsequently paid. This was in February, 1880. In April, May and June following, Young ordered other groceries, to the amount of $83.83 ; and the question is whether, by virtue of the foregoing letter, Mr. Knowlton is liable for this last bill.

We think he is not. It seems to us that the letter was not intended by the writer, and could not properly be understood by those to whom it was addressed, as creating a continuing liability. It expresses a willingness to' aid Mr. Young in starting a new branch of business, but fails to express an intention to continue such aid in the future. In the language of the letter, the aid which the writer proposes to render is to enable Mr. Young "to place a stock of groceries in his provision and meat store,” not [347]*347to replenish or keep suoh a stock good afterwards; and that when the stock of groceries had been selected, and, with the aid of Mr. Knowlton, had been paid for, the latter’s liability ended, and that two months after, other goods could not be sold to Mr. Young on Mr. Knowlton’s credit, without the latter’s consent, and a new promise to be accountable for them. Such being our conclusion, there is no occasion to consider the other questions argued by counsel.

Judgment for Mr. Knowlton, the plaintiff in review.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Virgin and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton, J.

On the 25th of February, 1880, Alfred Knowlton of Liberty, Maine, wrote a letter to E. C. Hersey & Co. of Portland, of the following tenor.

" Gentlemen: The bearer of this letter, my son-in-law, Mr. Arthur Young, wishes to place a stock of groceries in his provision and meat store in this place. To enable him to do this, I am willing to be responsible to you for the amount of groceries he may order of you.”

The question is whether or not this letter created a continuing-liability. • It appears that Mr. Young went with it to Hersey & Co., selected groceries to the amount of $432.45; for which his father-in-law, Mr. Knowlton, signed notes, which were subsequently paid. This was in February, 1880. In April, May and June following, Young ordered other groceries, to the amount of $83.83 ; and the question is whether, by virtue of the foregoing letter, Mr. Knowlton is liable for this last bill.

We think he is not. It seems to us that the letter was not intended by the writer, and could not properly be understood by those to whom it was addressed, as creating a continuing liability. It expresses a willingness to' aid Mr. Young in starting a new branch of business, but fails to express an intention to continue such aid in the future. In the language of the letter, the aid which the writer proposes to render is to enable Mr. Young "to place a stock of groceries in his provision and meat store,” not [347]*347to replenish or keep suoh a stock good afterwards; and that when the stock of groceries had been selected, and, with the aid of Mr. Knowlton, had been paid for, the latter’s liability ended, and that two months after, other goods could not be sold to Mr. Young on Mr. Knowlton’s credit, without the latter’s consent, and a new promise to be accountable for them. Such being our conclusion, there is no occasion to consider the other questions argued by counsel.

Judgment for Mr. Knowlton, the plaintiff in review.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Virgin and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Me. 345, 1884 Me. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowlton-v-hersey-me-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack