Knowlton v. Gerken

250 A.D. 819, 296 N.Y.S. 452, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116

This text of 250 A.D. 819 (Knowlton v. Gerken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowlton v. Gerken, 250 A.D. 819, 296 N.Y.S. 452, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that improper conduct on the part of the presentation of the defense prejudiced the rights of the plaintiff. (The resettled judgment is for defendant in an action upon a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D. 819, 296 N.Y.S. 452, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowlton-v-gerken-nyappdiv-1937.