Knowlton v. Gerken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knowlton v. Gerken

250 A.D. 819, 296 N.Y.S. 452, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1937·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that improper conduct on the part of the presentation of the defense prejudiced the rights of the plaintiff. (The resettled judgment is for defendant in an action upon a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that improper conduct on the part of the presentation of the defense prejudiced the rights of the plaintiff. (The resettled judgment is for defendant in an action upon a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Knowlton v. Gerken, 250 A.D. 819, 296 N.Y.S. 452, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 819 (Knowlton v. Gerken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.