Knowles v. Voorhies
2009 Ohio 1109, 903 N.E.2d 637, 121 Ohio St. 3d 271
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knowles v. Voorhies, 2009 Ohio 1109, 903 N.E.2d 637, 121 Ohio St. 3d 271 (Ohio 2009).
2009 Ohio 1109 (Knowles v. Voorhies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Jones v. Bradshaw
2009 Ohio 5586 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Shie v. Smith
2009 Ohio 4079 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)