Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Knowles v. Voorhies

Knowles v. Voorhies

2009 Ohio 1109, 903 N.E.2d 637, 121 Ohio St. 3d 271
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 2009
Docket2008-2261
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 1109 (Knowles v. Voorhies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowles v. Voorhies, 2009 Ohio 1109, 903 N.E.2d 637, 121 Ohio St. 3d 271 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer,’ C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Jones v. Bradshaw
2009 Ohio 5586 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Shie v. Smith
2009 Ohio 4079 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 1109, 903 N.E.2d 637, 121 Ohio St. 3d 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowles-v-voorhies-ohio-2009.