Knowles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Knowles v. State

1930 OK CR 306, 290 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 255, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 21, 1930·No. No. A-7425.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having unlawful possession of 11 gallons of corn whisky, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

But one question is presented by this appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Prom a careful examination of the record, we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having unlawful possession of 11 gallons of corn whisky, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

But one question is presented by this appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Prom a careful examination of the record, we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Knowles v. State, 1930 OK CR 306, 290 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 255, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 306 (Knowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.