Knowles v. State
This text of 968 So. 2d 623 (Knowles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brian M. KNOWLES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Brian M. Knowles, Polk City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order that denied appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion as successive, but echo the trial court's warning to appellant that his continual filing of procedurally barred or otherwise non-meritorious claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
968 So. 2d 623, 2007 WL 3010043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowles-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.