Knowles v. State
968 So. 2d 623, 2007 WL 3010043
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2007·No. 4D07-3392·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Brian M. KNOWLES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Brian M. Knowles, Polk City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order that denied appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion as successive, but echo the trial court's warning to appellant that his continual filing of procedurally barred or otherwise non-meritorious claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knowles v. State, 968 So. 2d 623, 2007 WL 3010043 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
968 So. 2d 623 (Knowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ambrister v. Florida Unemp. Appeals Com'n
968 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)