Knowles v. State

780 So. 2d 136, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9418, 2000 WL 1022309
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Brian M. Knowles’ (“Knowles”) motion to correct illegal sentence. This affirmance is without prejudice to Knowles re-filing his motion to present his claim that the sentencing score sheet erroneously reflected three prior first degree felonies, rather than two second degree felonies.

When re-filing the motion, Knowles shall furnish the trial court with the appropriate documentation, including but not limited to, the 1989 score sheet which he contends was not properly calculated, and copies of the prior judgments at issue.

DELL, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knowles v. State, 780 So. 2d 136, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9418, 2000 WL 1022309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

780 So. 2d 136 (Knowles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharick v. Southeastern University of Health Sciences, Inc.
780 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)