Knowles v. State
This text of 165 So. 2d 201 (Knowles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee, State of Florida, moves to dis-aniss this appeal upon the grounds that the following form of notice of appeal filed by appellant in his own proper person is insufficient:
“Clerk of Criminal Court in and for Duval County, State of Florida.
- Respondent -
Walter Frank Knowles P.O.Box 221 — R.D.C.C. Unit #4 Raiford, Florida - Petitioner -
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Comes now Walter Frank Knowles defendant, in proper person. Serves notice upon this Honorable Court, that he desires and seeks to be granted a new trial.
Said defendant was represented in court by counsel, said Honorable T. Edward Austin, Jr., Public Defender in and for Duval County, State of Florida. Trial date, December 10-11,1963.
Said defendant was to understand that appeal had been entered, but defendant has in no way been so notified.
Respectfully submitted JsJ Walter Frank Knowles”
and submits that it is not sufficient to vest jurisdiction in this Court.
Appellate jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties is acquired by the filing of a notice of appeal in the form and within the time required.1 The instant notice of appeal is deficient in that it does not contain the essential elements ■required by the Florida Appellate Rules,2 and unlike the situation which existed in the Seaboard Airline Railroad Company v. Holt,3 the contents do not constitute a substantial compliance with the applicable rule. The appellate courts of this state have consistently held that unless a notice of appeal is filed in the manner prescribed, jurisdiction is not vested in the appellate court.4 The timely and proper filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional essential to enable an appellate court to exercise its power. Since the instant notice does not constitute a proper filing, the State’s motion is granted and the cause is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 So. 2d 201, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowles-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.