Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Knowles v. Roser

Knowles v. Roser

135 S.E. 495, 36 Ga. App. 100, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 793
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17555
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 495 (Knowles v. Roser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowles v. Roser, 135 S.E. 495, 36 Ga. App. 100, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 793 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict for the defendant, and the refusal to grant the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 495, 36 Ga. App. 100, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowles-v-roser-gactapp-1926.