Knowles v. Farmers Bank

76 S.E. 1059, 12 Ga. App. 157, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 476
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 22, 1913
Docket4506
StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E. 1059 (Knowles v. Farmers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowles v. Farmers Bank, 76 S.E. 1059, 12 Ga. App. 157, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 476 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

There is no assignment of error as to any ruling during the trial, nor any complaint as to the charge of the court, and, as the evidence authorizes the finding of the jury, there was no error in refusing a new trial. The circumstances were sufficient to indicate that the holder of the note purchased it before maturity, and the jury had the right to' base their verdict upon the circumstantial evidence of the holder’s title as an innocent purchaser before the maturity of the note,' rather than upon the testimony adduced to show that the plaintiff was not in fact a bona fide holder of the note. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 1059, 12 Ga. App. 157, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowles-v-farmers-bank-gactapp-1913.