Knowle v. Kane

112 A.D.2d 53, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50707

This text of 112 A.D.2d 53 (Knowle v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowle v. Kane, 112 A.D.2d 53, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in [54]*54this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Okereke v. Kane
98 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 53, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowle-v-kane-nyappdiv-1985.