Knowle v. Kane
This text of 112 A.D.2d 53 (Knowle v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in [54]*54this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 53, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowle-v-kane-nyappdiv-1985.