Knott v. Volusia County

168 So. 925, 122 Fla. 879
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 925 (Knott v. Volusia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knott v. Volusia County, 168 So. 925, 122 Fla. 879 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1936, MONDAY, APRIL 27, A.D. 1936.
IN RE: AMENDMENT AND REVISION OF COMMON LAW RULES FOR GOVERNMENT OF TRIAL COURTS IN COMMON LAW CASES. Upon consideration of the Report of the Special Committee of the Florida State Bar Association submitting final draft of proposed rules to be adopted and promulgated for the government of courts of record in the hearing and determination of Common Law Cases in the trial Courts of this State, it is ordered and adjudged as follows:

(1) That the annexed rules and forms entitled: "Proposed Common Law Rules" be and the same are hereby ratified, adopted, approved and promulgated by the Supreme Court of Florida as rules of practice for the government of the several trial courts of record of this State in common law cases, said rules to become effective October 1, 1936.

(2) That on and after the effective date of the new rules hereby adopted with reference to common law causes, that all existing rules relating to common law causes be and the same are hereby superseded by said new rules.

(3) That this order and the accompanying draft of the common law rules hereby adopted be forthwith published in the current volume of the official Florida Reports, and likewise in the Southern Reporter, for the examination and guidance of the bench and bar in becoming familiar therewith prior to the effective date of same.

(4) That objections, if any, to the said rules, together with any proposals to suspend, alter or modify the same *Page 882 prior to the effective date of said rules, are required to be submitted to this Court in writing in the form of a written motion or motions duly signed by a member or members of the bar, on or before July 1, 1936, a copy of said motion or motions to be served in advance upon the Chairman of the Florida State Bar Association Committee proposing the said rules for adoption.

All of which is made a formal order of this Court to be entered on the minutes of the Court.

To the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court:

The committee heretofore appointed by the President of the State Bar Association at the request of the Court respectfully submits herewith the final draft of proposed common law rules as promulgated in accordance with instructions previously given the committee, the action of the Conference of Bar Delegates held at Tallahassee and subsequent action of the committee pursuant to instructions given at that meeting.

The committee has considered itself bound by the action of the Tallahassee meeting wherever affirmative action was taken at that meeting. Rules expressly approved at the meeting are embraced herein in the same form as approved. Rules which were specifically disapproved have been omitted. Where specific amendments were adopted at the Tallahassee meeting to rules proposed as published in the Florida Law Journal of October, 1935, they have been embraced in these rules. In cases where the meeting re-submitted rules for further action of the committee the committee has exercised its best judgment.

Notations accompany these rules indicating those which are copied verbatim from the October Journal, those which were specifically amended at the Tallahassee meeting, those which were resubmitted to the committee and present rules *Page 883 from which taken. In such notations "published rule" refers to the rules as published in the October Journal and "present rule" refers to the rules as now existing.

The rules submitted herewith follow the numbering as published with the exception that some changes have been necessitated by the rejection of published rules 6, 9 and 51 and also by the renumbering of the ejectment rules.

In accordance with the instructions to the committee and the subsequent action of the committee these rules are submitted herewith for the consideration of the Court.

CLAIBOURNE M. PHIPPS, Chairman.

PROPOSED COMMON LAW RULES.
RULE 1.

Court and Judge Synonymous.

Wherever in these rules reference is made to the court the same shall be construed to apply to a judge thereof whenever the context shall require or permit.

RULE 2.

Presiding Judge.

When there be more than one judge of a trial court, the judge longest in continuous service and able to act shall be the presiding judge for administrative purposes, and the judges of such court may provide by local rule for the distribution of the work of such court to the judges thereof.

RULE 3.

Attorneys — Not to Be Sureties.

No attorney or other officer of court shall enter himself or be taken as bail or surety in any proceeding in court on *Page 884 pain of being considered in contempt and, if the attorney represent the plaintiff, the proceedings may be dismissed.

RULE 4.

Attorneys — To Vouch Authority.

Every attorney appearing on behalf of a party to a cause may be required by an order of court to vouch for his authority to represent such party and to give the address of such party.

RULE 5.

Time — Reckoning.

In all cases in which any particular number of days, not expressed to be clear days, is allowed or prescribed, the same shall be reckoned exclusive of the first day and inclusive of the last day unless the last day shall fall on Sunday or on New Year's Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, Armistice Day, Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, in which case the time shall be reckoned exclusive of that day also; provided, however, that in all cases where the period of time is less than one week any Sunday or any such holiday intervening shall be excluded in the calculation.

RULE 6.

Stipulation — How Effected.

(a) No private agreement or consent between parties or their attorneys in respect to the proceedings in a cause shall be of any force before the court, unless the evidence thereof shall be in writing, subscribed by the party or his attorney, against whom it is alleged.

(b) Parol agreements may be made before the court. *Page 885

RULE 7.

Term Time and Vacation — Distinction Abolished.

Unless otherwise expressly provided by statute or these rules there shall be no distinction between term time and vacation as to pleadings or proceedings before trial.

RULE 8.

Motions to Be Written.

Motions required by law or these rules and not made in open court shall be in writing and due notice given to the opposite party.

RULE 9.

Hearings — Notice of.

Hearings requiring notice shall be had only after reasonable notice, but no such hearing shall be had except on five (5) days' written notice when the opposing attorney resides without the county wherein such hearing shall be had.

RULE 10.

Notices — Effect of — How Served — Computation of Time.

(a) Notice by or to or service upon an attorney of record shall have the same force and effect as personal notice by or to or service upon the party represented by such attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 925, 122 Fla. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knott-v-volusia-county-fla-1935.