Knott v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

230 U.S. 509, 33 S. Ct. 984, 57 L. Ed. 1595, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2688
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 16, 1913
Docket343, 344, 353, 354, 355, 356, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 369, 370, 371, 372
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 230 U.S. 509 (Knott v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knott v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., 230 U.S. 509, 33 S. Ct. 984, 57 L. Ed. 1595, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2688 (1913).

Opinion

By Mb. Justice Hughes.

These suits, with ten others,

were brought to restrain the enforcement of the freight-rate and passenger-fare acts of the State of Missouri passed in the years 1905 and 1907, as violative of the Federal Constitution. (See Missouri Rate Cases, decided this day, ante, p. 474).

Upon the hearing below, a stipulation was made br each of these eight suits, and orders were entered thereon, that it should abide “by the orders, judgment and decree that may be made and entered” in one of the other suits named, as follows:

The suit of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company was to abide that of the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company; the suits of the Missouri *511 Pacific Railway Company; the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, that of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company; the suits of the Wabash Railroad Company and the Chicago & Alton Railway Company,, that of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company; and the suits of the Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad Company and the St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Company, .that of the Chicago Great Western Railway Company.

The decrees below were entered in accordance with these stipulations. No questions for. our consideration are presented by the appeals and cross-appeals in these cases. The remedy of the parties is to apply to the court below in accordance with the stipulations to have decrees entered in the respective suits similar to those which we have directed to be entered' in the cases to which the stipulations refer. The appeals and cross-appeals are therefore dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
292 U.S. 13 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Briney
277 S.W. 25 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 U.S. 509, 33 S. Ct. 984, 57 L. Ed. 1595, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knott-v-st-louis-southwestern-railway-co-scotus-1913.