Knopp v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Knopp v. State

21 S.E.2d 910, 68 Ga. App. 14

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 16, 1942

Docket29726.

StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E.2d 910 (Knopp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knopp v. State, 21 S.E.2d 910, 68 Ga. App. 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and he excepted. The sheriff testified positively that at the time he arrested the defendant he was in possession of four pints of non-tax-paid whisky which the defendant held in his hand. He stated to the sheriff: “Luther, you have caught me.” In his statement the defendant denied possession of whisky. The jury believed the sheriff and returned a verdict against the defendant. Counsel contends that, since one Blake Potts pleaded guilty to the illegal possession of the same whisky, the conviction of the defendant was illegal. If it be conceded that the plea of guilty of Potts involved the same whisky, still this would not acquit the defendant. All who are concerned, directly or indirectly, in *15 the commission of a misdemeanor are principals. The evidence sustained the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J:, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and he excepted. The sheriff testified positively that at the time he arrested the defendant he was in possession of four pints of non-tax-paid whisky which the defendant held in his hand. He stated to the sheriff: “Luther, you have caught me.” In his statement the defendant denied possession of whisky. The jury believed the sheriff and returned a verdict against the defendant. Counsel contends that, since one Blake Potts pleaded guilty to the illegal possession of the same whisky, the conviction of the defendant was illegal. If it be conceded that the plea of guilty of Potts involved the same whisky, still this would not acquit the defendant. All who are concerned, directly or indirectly, in *15 the commission of a misdemeanor are principals. The evidence sustained the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J:, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 S.E.2d 910, 68 Ga. App. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knopp-v-state-gactapp-1942.