Knopf v. Esposito
Opinion
BERRY LAW PLLC 745 FIFTH AVENUE, 5" Floor New York, New YORK 10151 MEMO ENDORSE Phone (212) 355-0777 Fax (212) 750-1371 Eric W. Berry (NY) e-mail BerryLawPlic @gmail.com February 2, 2021 Hon. Denise L. Cote, U.S.D.J. (via ECF) Senator Daniel P. Moynihan Federal Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 15B New York, New York 10007 Amended Letter Motion to Seal the Knopfs’ Response to Esposito’s Request for a Stay Your Honor: The Knopfs request an order that the Court seal the un-redacted version of their February 2, 2021 Response to defendant Frank Esposito’s Request for a Stay of this case. The Knopfs believe that the requested sealing order and redaction is necessary to “preserve the integrity of a government investigation and law enforcement interests. . . [.]” In re Applications to Unseal 98 CR 1101(ILG), 568 Fed.Appx. 68, 70 (2d Cir. 2014). For the above reasons, the Knopfs respectfully request that the Court grant their application to redact and concurrently file under seal their response to Esposito’s Letter Motion. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Eric W. Berry Eric W. Berry cc: all counsel and pro se parties (by the ECF system)
The proposed redactions are approved. 2.3.2021 DENISE COTE United Btates District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knopf v. Esposito (Knopf v. Esposito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.