Knopf v. Alpine Industries Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knopf v. Alpine Industries Inc.

55 A.D.2d 527, 389 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15170

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 527 (Knopf v. Alpine Industries Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knopf v. Alpine Industries Inc., 55 A.D.2d 527, 389 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 9, 1975, granting plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clauses in the complaint is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion denied, without costs and without disbursements. Although plaintiffs’ attorney learned of the alleged increased seriousness of plaintiff wife’s injuries in July, 1974, no motion to amend the ad damnum clause was made for 22 months thereafter. In the interim plaintiffs served bills of particulars and placed the case on the calendar. No acceptable excuse is given for the delay. And the amounts originally sued for seem quite ample to cover the injuries claimed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 9, 1975, granting plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clauses in the complaint is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion denied, without costs and without disbursements. Although plaintiffs’ attorney learned of the alleged increased seriousness of plaintiff wife’s injuries in July, 1974, no motion to amend the ad damnum clause was made for 22 months thereafter. In the interim plaintiffs served bills of particulars and placed the case on the calendar. No acceptable excuse is given for the delay. And the amounts originally sued for seem quite ample to cover the injuries claimed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 527, 389 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knopf-v-alpine-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1976.