Knollwood Real Estate Co. v. Planning Board of Elmsford

122 A.D.2d 779, 505 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59296

This text of 122 A.D.2d 779 (Knollwood Real Estate Co. v. Planning Board of Elmsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knollwood Real Estate Co. v. Planning Board of Elmsford, 122 A.D.2d 779, 505 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination dated February 7, 1984, denying the petitioners’ application for subdivision approval, the Planning Board of the Village of Elmsford appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.), entered October 4, 1984, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed it to approve the subdivision application.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The functions of a village planning board are, in the final analysis, subject to the approval of the village board of trustees (Village Law § 7-720). At no point did the Board of Trustees of the Village of Elmsford authorize the appellant to dismiss the Village Attorney, appoint its own attorney and take the instant appeal. Instead of approving the. appellant’s actions, the Board of Trustees subsequently passed a resolution exempting the subject property from the necessity of subdivision or plat plan approval, thus rendering the instant appeal moot. Further the Board of Trustees purportedly replaced the appellant Planning Board with a planning commission. Under the circumstances, the matter is not properly before this court. We note, however, that the appellant failed to specify the reasons for its refusal to approve the petitioners’ [780]*780subdivision application, in contravention of Village Law § 7-728 (4); thus, in any case, the instant appeal is without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 7-728
New York VIL § 7-728(4)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.2d 779, 505 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knollwood-real-estate-co-v-planning-board-of-elmsford-nyappdiv-1986.