Knoll v. Seafood Express

836 N.E.2d 1148, 5 N.Y.3d 817, 803 N.Y.S.2d 25
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In light of the fact that plaintiffs benign brain stem angioma condition preexisted the accident, plaintiff failed to submit medical proof sufficient to rebut defendants’ submissions and to show that he suffered a serious injury that is causally related to the accident (see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 580 [2005]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knoll v. Seafood Express, 836 N.E.2d 1148, 5 N.Y.3d 817, 803 N.Y.S.2d 25 (N.Y. 2005).

836 N.E.2d 1148 (Knoll v. Seafood Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronda v. Friendly Baptist Church
52 A.D.3d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Flores v. Leslie
27 A.D.3d 220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)